|
|
|
|
|
by rramadass
43 days ago
|
|
Again this nonsense; Don't selectively quote from one source which is dishonest. That link and the other sources i had provided contain more data which you are intentionally obfuscating. There are already a few existing bypass pipelines and older ones are being recommissioned in addition to planned new ones. For your edification, here is a short reuters note on existing and proposed (does not list all) pipelines bypassing Hormuz - https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/alternative-routes-m... Finally, note that capacities of existing pipelines can also be increased by using techniques like "Drag Reducing Agents" (DRA) amongst others. |
|
All the 'possible alternative routes' remain in 'conceptual' stage. The east/west and Fujeirah pipelines are operational, and, as discussed before, insufficient. That was my whole point (especially w.r.t. to UAE).
The KIRKUK-CEYHAN pipeline is middling (170k barrels/day, up to 250k) and does not help UAE at all.
The Goreh-Jask pipeline is in IRAN! (an not really operational), does not help UAE at all.
Don't you read with comprehension? Don't you see that this is another irrelevant reference that does not address my point at all?