[nathanmills]

Thank goodness that no kidnapping of an American has ever happened since.

[Geof25]

It is illegal to commit a crime. So no crimes will be committed. Duh.

[eviks]

That's the magic of Laws!

[JumpCrisscross]

Hmm, there was once fraud so I guess we should repeal any prohibitions on fraud, huh? Same for murder.

[nathanmills]

Calm down, extremist. There's a difference between someone doing something vs someone paying someone else to stop doing something. If the latter were truly bad then the same should be applied to people handing over their wallet to muggers. The only difference in that scenario and the above is saving yourself vs saving a family member. Would you really deny people the ability to save their loved ones?

[JumpCrisscross]

> then the same should be applied to people handing over their wallet to muggers

Not really. Muggings are both more common and less traumatic than kidnappings. This is reflected in the fact that common and maximum sentences for kidnappings are universally more extreme than those for muggings.

> Would you really deny people the ability to save their loved ones?

...yes. Because it means significantly fewer kidnappings. "Deny people the ability to save their loved ones" is tantamount to "help others to lose their own."

[nathanmills]

And where does ransomware fall on that trauma scale? The maximum sentence is less than mugging after all..

[JumpCrisscross]

> does ransomware fall on that trauma scale?

Idk. That’s a step (sentencing guidelines) after we decide it should be criminalized.

> The maximum sentence is less than mugging after all..

They’re in the same ballpark, 2 to 6 years or so.

[nathanmills]

> That’s a step (sentencing guidelines) after we decide it should be criminalized.

You decide it should be criminalized before you identify any harms?

> They’re in the same ballpark, 2 to 6 years or so.

You can just look it up. Maximum sentence for mugging is 30 years, ransomware is 20.