[Domenic_S]

I cringe a little bit whenever someone tries to present caching as simple or straightforward.

[drivebyacct2]

I don't see that anywhere in the post. All I saw was "GET"s shouldn't modify state and should be cacheable. That seems perfectly in line with the spec.

[jebblue]

The only problem I have with your comment is that REST is not specified, it's a style:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representational_state_transfer

[Ramone]

GET being cacheable/idempotent is part of the HTTP spec, and has nothing to do with REST: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec13.html#sec13...

[drivebyacct2]

I meant the HTTP spec which is where GETs specified.