I basically don't read anything that looks LLM-generated at this point, so I'd prefer that you included your rambling version alongside if you still want to have a generated version.
There is a subtle hubris in the attempt to wrap reality around one's own preference rather than the one adapting their own perceptions to match reality.
You seem to like SQL, don't you? Your README reads a bit fallacious: Just because SQL is a great alive language, it doesn't make your language a great one. I think it's called survivor bias.
This comment is evidence that your write-up would have been just fine and understandable by other humans. Using AI to write your technical writing for you makes me lose trust in what you're saying. No one cares if you're a non-native English speaker, just write.
Your English seems good enough to communicate. I'd encourage you to trust your abilities; any misunderstandings can be clarified with follow-up questions if necessary.
Me explaining to a teacher why i cheated on the test: well did you stop to consider the cognitive load of doing the problems myself and how much easier it was to cheat?
True, correlated with the ubiquitous push toward using LLMs everywhere and papering over their faults, hoping that people will ignore the fact that they are ceding more and more control of their lives and freedom to the hyperrich.
> A significant portion of the tech industry is rapidly becoming conservative.
I think it has less to do with being more conservative and more to do with not losing one of the few remaining ways to see the personality of other tech people.
I do that for most of my docs because I ramble.
I prefer my rambling, but I think others like the tidied up LLM summary.
How does this document score - just wrote it today, used Gemini to sum it up: https://github.com/cuzzo/clear/blob/master/docs/retrospectiv...