|
|
|
|
|
by yummybrainz
31 days ago
|
|
As a recent grad who also refused to use LLMs, the last sentence in the article was one of the primary reasons why: > “I’m here to learn how to do things,” she adds. “I don’t think outsourcing it to a large language model is the goal of a PhD for me.” I wanted my cognitive abilities and technical skills to improve, not just produce output more efficiently. IMHO, abstracting over these low-/mid-level skills and focusing on "high-level ideas" is worth it for experts who've already internalized the deep knowledge and know-how; for a novice like me, I need to suffer through the details before understanding things better. Other more idiosyncratic reasons: (i) I try to use only FOSS tools on principle, and frontier models aren't; (ii) When I graduated, LLMs weren't quite as great as they are today and I wouldn't trust their output for anything important; I would happily use LLMs to learn new things though! I've tried some local LLMs, but they weren't particularly impressive last time. I should re-evaluate now; it's been several months. |
|