[boxed]

I re-read that passage where he mentions the speed of light. Clearly he's trying to explain that if you start from the bottom of what the hardware can do and try to get that all to the programmers hands then you have something that is close to the theoretical speed. This is different from trying to go down the stack from python down and seeing where you can optimize.

I think you're a bit too angry already to interpret what he's saying as how he meant it. You seem to be twisting everything to make it sound stupid.

[dtj1123]

From my perspective, you're reaching for extremely unlikely explanations of his underlying meaning in order to avoid having to consider the possibility that he may have been dishonest, whilst you've been gullible.

However, I'll happily acknowledge that I'm fallible and that perhaps this argument is all a product of my neuroses.