|
|
|
|
|
|
by throwthrowuknow
31 days ago
|
|
|
This could have been a good piece of writing if the author chose not to be so smugly overconfident in their belief and show real evidence to support their claim. Mentioning the front page of HN as your source is glib and immediately made me doubt the conclusions. I was interested to see what work the author put into researching this but apparently they didn’t do any work at all. When an LLM provides you with an overconfident piece of writing with no sources to back it up, what do you do? |
|
|
You draw made up lines on made up plots and call it evidence, obviously.