[yuppiepuppie]

The best code review improvement I have done in my workflow with Claude is using tuicr (https://tuicr.dev).

It runs locally, YOU review all the code locally, and feedback that to Claude.

Agents reviewing AI code always felt dirty to me, especially when working on production (non-disposable) code.

[psadauskas]

I've been using https://github.com/choplin/code-review.nvim, which looks like a similar UI, but in the NeoVim interface. `<leader>rc` to comment on a line/selection, then `<leader>ry` to yank all comments into the clipboard to be pasted into a chat.

It leaves the comments as markdown files in ./.code-review, so I also have my `/review` agent set to output in the same format, so an LLM can be reviewing the same code I am, I can edit or dismiss the LLM's reviews, then send the whole thing back to the first agent to fix.

[2001zhaozhao]

I wonder if a custom UI that auto-layouts different files in a 2D grid and connects them to each other in a graph in an intuitive way would help a lot with review velocity.

As in, if you have a large screen, a particularly-trained/prompted AI can organize the code changes in a "flowchart" with floating windows you can easily follow

Maybe in this UI, each code piece also comes with a summary from an agent that has already auto-reviewed the whole PR and creates a basic summary (instructed to be neutral but surface issues if it finds any).

[tomasz-tomczyk]

Same experience here - I built a similar tool, for reviewing both plans and code - https://crit.md (shameless plug), browser based as opposed to TUI.

Having said that, I don't review the code until going through a few iterations of reviews from Claude. Each round it does find some "obvious" issue, so as long as I'm not close to maxing my subscription for the week I let it run an audit -> validator checks the claims -> fix issues before I get to it.

[suralind]

I was thinking for years about doing something like this. Thank you for linking this. Would be nice if it allowed to "reject" or mark a change to fix later, but honestly when it would need to be linked to some tracking tool and it would be overkill.

[ramon156]

The video actually convinced me that this might be an interesting tool. I'm going to try it myself for a small one-shot project and see how well it performs.

TUI-based reviews on it's own are already interesting. I had never considered it, I guess.

[free652]

that's a good addition to fresh editor (also tui) and both rust