|
|
|
|
|
|
by ComplexSystems
44 days ago
|
|
|
That makes sense. If you could magically just get the top d PCs in quadratic kernel space without having to compute the whole kernel matrix, and then just do top-d quadratic PCs -> ridge, would that be better than doing the PCA -> top-d -> quadratic kernel ridge as you are now? |
|
|