|
|
|
|
|
by anymouse123456
39 days ago
|
|
I agree, this is a common story and your point stands for some significant percentage of the complaints. It should be made clear though, that some of us helped spend many millions in obviously wasteful on-prem infra in the nineties, bought into AWS wholeheartedly when it came out, fought through the ignorance, developed the ability to deliver highly scaled applications on the platform over many years and at least some of us still carry those same beliefs: - It's more complicated than it needs to be - It's more expensive than it should be - Pricing is more opaque than it should be Meanwhile, the cost of other options (including self-managed, on-prem infra) has fallen massively since those early days of AWS. |
|
There are also other things that the cloud hides in its price as well. Redundant networking, provisioning, rack space, internet connections, firewalls, UPS backup, power usage.
Still I think a lot of startups would benefit from hosting their own stuff if they intend to be a long term business instead of just shooting their shot and hoping to be acquired.