[MSFT_Edging]

The forest where the community hikes has no value unless the trees are turned into paper.

All to say, Capital at large seeks out the profit. Until climate change effects the profit considerably, mitigation will be the path less traveled.

The only real way to approach this problem is to reduce consumption across the board which as you might guess, isn't profitable.

[hashmap]

reducing consumption across the board isnt just unprofitable, it would mean everyone agreeing to overcome our biological gradients. i do not think it is possible for us to do, and evolution has not equipped us to do that as far as i can tell.

my semi-superstitious take is that the race to achieve ai is grounded in needing something that knows whats going on and is able to make decisions aligned to generational time horizons. whether that works out or not time will tell, but i get the sense a "good enough" ai is probably our best shot at saving us from ourselves. it's clear we can't do that on our own.

[conception]

I think it’s grounded with the thinking that whoever gets WOPR first wins.

[unethical_ban]

Which is why, to be blunt, libertarians and conservatives are wrong to demonize government without being equally or more skeptical of the corrupting power of money.

Government is the only apparatus that can govern unregulated motivations of capital, and we need regulations on pollution and investments in clean energy and waste creation/collection to stop things like climate change.

Gen X and forward grew up in a world that by default was cleaner due to regulations like the Clean Water Act, better for seniors due to things like Social Security and Medicare, and safer due to things like food regulations and vaccine mandates. The people who rail against these things are railing against the very things that made their world safer and in some instances kept them alive.

[dualvariable]

Yeah, this is why I'm not a Libertarian. Concentrated power in the hands of single individuals impacts the freedom and liberty of everyone else. That holds if the person is the head of government, or the CEO of a corporation.

[GolfPopper]

>The only real way to approach this problem is to reduce consumption across the board which as you might guess, isn't profitable.

We need a human civilization that is run for the benefit of human beings, not paper-clip maximizing overlords.

[MSFT_Edging]

Then people cry "tyranny!" when they're not allowed to pollute a river.