[Aurornis]

That is not my position at all and it’s dishonest to project it upon my writings.

I said this is an important detail to the story because it’s literally the central trigger point. For as many details as she’s willing to share, include admissions that could theoretically impact legal proceedings, excluding the core charge from the story raises suspicions about the trustworthiness of the narrator.

To be clear I do not support the treatment as reported. However the omission of this one key detail is a calculated omission by the author, where we’re supposed to both believe it’s entirely normal and benign but at the same time it’s also something that must be withheld from this story?

[idle_zealot]

Sorry if it doesn't apply to you. I think that's how a lot of readers would categorize you based on the insistence that the crime was important, and why you were downvoted at the time of writing.