[shahbaby]

> People love to interpret the results in the most negative way possible because it's a threat to their occupation and identity.

OR it could be because their concerns are genuine but are ignored in favour of a good sounding story.

[threethirtytwo]

But no one in this thread addressed the inaccuracy of the experiment. The experiment did not test the actuality of HOW LLMs are used in reality.

So that is definitively a biased interpretation. This is independent of how accurate my POV or your POV is on whether LLMs degrade documents. I am simply saying the experiment conducted is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT from how LLMs AND humans edit papers.