[256_]

> So... I think scripting is actually really important -- otherwise not only are you stuck with the lowest common denominator of all browsers, but the browsers need to implement a billion bug-prone views -- that map view link mentioned? Now you need a map viewer!

In the browser? The map viewer could just be a separate programme entirely, like a PDF viewer, etc. I remember watching rdg (the current main Dillo developer) demonstrating this with a separate map programme.

Most of your post seems to assume this "everything must be in the browser" approach, which is actively not what Dillo is about. (I would know, I use Dillo regularly.) It adheres to the Unix philosophy.

EDIT: Looking at it closely, did I just respond to an LLM post?

[tekne]

Nope -- those are artisanal, hand-written tokens. I suppose a slopatron could have said that just as well though.

I agree with the UNIX philosophy bit, mind you -- modern browsers don't do that and that is bad.

But you should be able to download new components from the Internet without trusting them -- a separate install step is not only tedious, it also might cause you to add new trusted software to your computer.

Going back to the map example -- you want your environment to be able to auto-download the map painter and paint you the map without needing either to manually do that or to trust the map painter.