[tempaccount5050]

Ok let's make math illegal and burn down the data centers I guess. Idk what to tell you, but we will adapt and new roles will be created. Just like every single tool and piece of tech that came before. LLM manager? Fine.

[Peaches4Rent]

The difference so far is that these LLMs are owned by corporations, and very aggressive American corporations at that.

So now you are essentially reliant on them.

Not saying that this is something new, but times they are a changin

[pear01]

Don't use your laptop. Or your phone. It's owned by a corporation.

Do you hear yourself? If you don't want to rely on corporations go live in the woods.

[phatfish]

The parent said American corporations. No one with any sense wants a dependency critical to their state or private company sitting under the direct control of America any more.

[Thanemate]

I think it's intellectually dishonest to dismiss the absolute accumulation of human's knowledge under very specific brands for profitability using false equivalencies. When I build something using chatGPT, especially if I was unable to build it before, I arrive at a result that I could have previously arrived with "hard work" by skipping the "hard work" part.

Now, many will argue that you wouldn't have poured in time and energy in that endeavour anyways, so it's fine. But the crucial part missing here is the effort. We're about to witness the side effects of societal-wide reliance on LLM's, the same way we're still paying the price for the social media boom, misinformation, propaganda, echo-chambers and algorithmic bubbles.

Notice that none of the above actually invented misinformation, etc. they just magnified an existing problem. LLM's magnify the need to "get it done, fast" but I don't see the engineering excellence everyone promised me that I'll see at any level.

[anyonecancode]

In the US, much of the woods are owned by corporations too. Those that aren't are, in theory, owned by the public, but the oligarchs work hard to hollow that out so that practically public lands are owned by them too.

[jplusequalt]

>Just like every single tool and piece of tech that came before.

The thing about relying on the past to predict the future is that works ... until it doesn't.

We've yet to see a technology with as diverse utility as LLMs. What happens when not just the tech sector starts downsizing, but the whole white collar workforce?

[achierius]

> new roles will be created.

In the past, one such "new role" was that of slave. In fact, we expect slavery is <10,000 years old! Yes, new roles will be created. But there's nothing to say that they'll be pleasant for us to take on.