Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by fooqux 37 days ago
I think at least part of the reason for this is acknowledging that the web isn't much of a web any longer. You've got three or four vendors that serve the vast majority of all internet traffic. And it's not happenstance that those same vendors now control something which was originally meant to be democratic.

Most of this document reads to me like that's the problem they're trying to solve, not just chrome's huge marketshare, so simply not targeting it doesn't serve their purpose.

1 comments

how is the web not democratic?

in real democracies the populists (facebook, tiktok, chrome) always win. because that's what the masses want

> in real democracies the populists (facebook, tiktok, chrome) always win. because that's what the masses want

Is Friedrich Merz a populist? Was Angela Merkel a populist? This theory seems to have considerable limits.

All I can say is if OP's name were "xhtmlenjoyye" they'd respond like so:

The context is real democracies, not messy extant nation-state governments. Please delete your comment so no one can read it.

Online communities win because of network effects, members get tied to their addresses and it becomes very difficult to migrate, new members always join the network because that is where everyone is already. Democracies don't necessary depend on network effects, members of political parties can relatively easily migrate to different parties, network effects is not what keeps members part of a political party. And crucially, being part of a political party doesn't mean you'll vote for the party when you cast your ballot.

Some will say that the solution to network effects on the Web is decentralization but decentralization doesn't scale. Because of spam, bots and the fact that not everyone will follow the protocol there is always a need for moderators which is just another word for government and Google's main business model.

Even Capitalism is largely decentralized but it can't function without government. I believe true decentralization (anarchism) is only possible on a small scale where everyone knows each other, very small communities. It's not possible on the global level like in Capitalism or even the Web.

Whoever has the most compute controls the narrative. It's AIs biggest contribution to the internet.
Google drop the mask