[palata]

Are you calling me a corporate apologist? For one, corporations want less regulation.

"Being a hacker" does not mean "being stuck in the 80s", IMO. If TooBigTech cryptographically controls everything, it becomes harder to hack. Are you aware that the biggest restriction against jailbreaking stuff is that it was made super illegal... because it helps corporations?

[dmix]

You open with corporations want less regulations then give an example of corporations using law to protect their interests around jailbreaking? Just like they did with copyright/IP rules and the million rules around cars

You should ask the DIY diabetes community what they think of FDA regulations preventing modifications of medical devices.

Being reductive about this stuff is not a helpful framing.

[deaux]

> Are you calling me a corporate apologist? For one, corporations want less regulation

Ah yes, so that's why Meta et al are the main ones behind pushes for more "think of the children" ID verification/attestation regulations.

[palata]

Is that how it went? My feeling is that more and more people are realising that social media are terrible for the children (well, for everybody, but children we want to protect). Therefore more governments are looking into preventing children from accessing social media. Therefore social media companies are trying to lobby for whatever is better for them.

For Meta, it's better to have age verification than to downright ban social media.

[f1shy]

In my experience they DO want more regulation. Regulation that helps them. The automobile’s industry was lobbying for years to have all kinds of things mandatory. They invented lots of standards and pseudo standards. At the end they shoot themselves in the foot.