|
|
|
|
|
by canucker2016
34 days ago
|
|
I think it'll be a war of who has the better LLMs-as-security-scanner. Ideally, you'd do a comprehensive all-source-code scan, (and the LLM-scanner finds everything during those scans), and fix all the reported defects. Afterwards, any dev that commits code will run the LLM-scanner on the modified code (and affected areas) and fix any reported defects. So the black-hat hacker would be shut out unless they get access to an LLM-scanner with better analysis than what the target project is using. Major LLM-scanners could give priority access for new versions of LLM-scanners to major projects to find any defects in the current source code before any other party could use the reported defects against the project or their users. So black-hat hackers would be left with developing their own LLM-scanner better/more efficient than existing major LLM-scanners. Given enough incentive, they might develop such a tool. Look at the market for zero-day vulnerabilities for smartphones, esp iPhones. |
|