|
|
|
|
|
by berkes
34 days ago
|
|
TBC, my point wasn't that such economic reasoning is "wrong" or a problem. It was that our economics are flawed. In your example, the issue is quite clear: costs are externalized.
The cost to remove your tent is externalized by the festival across all visitors: guest who clean up after themselves, pay for guests that pollute. via increased ticket costs. And the costs of pollution, emissions, etc are not in the price of the tent, they are for a large part shifted to future generations and for a smaller part paid by Chinese and European tax payers, etc. A "pure", "capitalist" economy would make the buyer of that tent pay for all of that. In which case a tent is so expensive, you'll gladly pay an extra €40. And in which case repairability durability or sustainability decrease the price: a throwaway will cost more in the shop than one that'll last decades. |
|