[madmountaingoat]

Seems reasonable to me. The article doesn't say to trust the LLM blindly, as many early commenters seem to think, instead it suggests an evolution to a set of practices that provide similar guardrails at a faster cadence.

The argument in the comments about lack of determinism is just weird because humans are not deterministic machines and they're arguing about keeping one non-deterministic thing in the loop but scoffing at another.

And the pedantry about reviewing compiler output is just as silly. Yes it happens but in the broad world of software engineering unless you're working on the tools themselves, or chasing a really tricky bug, no one looks at the byte code.