[wongarsu]

At some point someone optimizes the system to a global company-wide incrementing 128 bit counter. Instead of needing a costly database lookup against a growing database the microservice just fetches the current counter, increments it by one and hands out the new value. Easy, fast O(1) operation.

This even allows you to shard the service to provide high availability and distribute the service globally to reduce latency. Just give each instance a dedicated id range it can hand out. I'd suggest reserving some of the high bits to indicate data center id, and a couple more bits for id-generator instance within that dc.

Wait a second, this starts to look familiar ... does Twitter still do that, or did they eventually switch?

[kuratkull]

Define a random 128 bit key that you will never change. Use that key to encrypt 128 bit integers in sequence using AES-128, each one comes out as a, for all practical purposes, unique unpredictable ID.

[pinkmuffinere]

> each one comes out as a, for all practical purposes, unique unpredictable ID

I don't have much cryptography experience, but this seems _suuuuper_ suspicious. I think the "for all practical purposes" is doing a lot of lifting here? If it was this easy, surely this is what we'd use, and there wouldn't be UUID v4 to begin with.

[kristjansson]

The value of uuid is the lack of coordination. “…integers in sequence…” requires quite a bit of coordination if you have more than one computer ;)

[sheept]

Twitter snowflakes haven't changed. Most of the bits go to the timestamp, which I guess is a global incrementing counter as you described

[throw0101c]

> At some point someone optimizes the system to a global company-wide incrementing 128 bit counter.

Some UUID versions include time, so there's a bit of a counter in that.

[kristjansson]

What is the arrow of time if not a single global monotonically increasing sequence?