|
|
|
|
|
by pjmlp
35 days ago
|
|
Not really, because contrary to Rust, Haskell, C++ and OCaml have faster alternatives, even though some people decide to ignore them to their own pain. Haskell has GHCi, where you can pre-compile modules and play around in the repl with code that is more in flow. OCaml has a bytecode interpreter, and a repl, thus you can compile only what you need, and do the full compilation for proper releases. C++, well, yes it is slow, if you don't make use of binary libraries, external templates, incremental compilation and incremental linking, parallel builds, hot code reloading (VC++ and Live++), or REPLs (ROOT/cling, Clang-Repl). |
|