[pessimizer]

> I think however that all that is needed to bridge the gap is some very simple feedback from an expert at the right time.

This could be a viable business idea. LLMs have allowed people to code who have very little understanding of how computers work but maybe a lot of specific domain knowledge and a good idea for a tool that could solve a problem. Maybe they need to rent a manager/advisor to review what they're doing and provide sanity checks.

Maybe pay for an hour a day of somebody reviewing your day's work and sending you a bit of prose explaining the parts that are wrong-headed about it?

I guess the problem with this might be that the review may just end up virtually identical to a prompt in the end; and if you can't completely remove the programmer when you have the domain knowledge, it might be easier to use the LLM for the domain knowledge you lack as a programmer. The work product is on a computer, computing might be the most relevant thing to know.

But independent writers hire editors, seems like the same sort of thing.