|
|
|
|
|
|
by QuercusMax
47 days ago
|
|
|
Results are results, though. By "artificial results" do you mean those that merely appear to be results, or do you mean results achieved via nonhuman means? If I write the exact same code as the AI, our results will be indistinguishable. |
|
|
But I mean: they appear to be results. They look real, but are not. There are subtle errors hidden that the casual observer will not, or even cannot detect.
Obviously there are exceptions to this. Many exceptions. AI right now can probably write most if not all algorithms on par or better than I could. It can put together working prototypes for many ideas I've had and not had time to implement.
But the danger is in assuming that because it can do A, it can do B, because a human that does A can do B.