|
|
|
|
|
|
by JumpCrisscross
38 days ago
|
|
|
> in practice contracts to provide civilian personnel to the Pentagon contain clauses limiting the nature and location of the work Which is what Anthropic was seeking to do. To be clear, I’m unsympathetic to Anthropic’s automated kill-decision objection. But I’m very sympathetic to their no-domestic-use requirement. And that aligns cleanly with precedent for civilian personnel having limits on “the nature and location” of their work. > Saying that is a breach of contract-unless Unless you’re negotiating the contract. |
|
|
One inherent issue with this set of choices is that you're OK with getting killed upon a decision made by a foreign AI agent.
Sadly, such a loophole already exists[0] and means that your own administration wouldn't be spying/executing you with AI, but oops - some ally (not even an adversary!) might on their behalf.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Eyes#Domestic_espionage_s...