|
|
|
|
|
|
by PaulDavisThe1st
39 days ago
|
|
|
> It seems hard to believe that the people who make Photoshop do not use Photoshop to the degree necessary to notice these regressions. Why? The actual people who make Photoshop are programmers, and this is a tool for image editing. |
|
|
Obviously they should have a few power users on payroll that find these obvious regressions quickly, and we can call them part of the team who make Photoshop. I'm not sure why this, and what the lead scientist said is valid justification. Just hire "people that use Photoshop". If they already do this, then the people that make Photoshop use Photoshop to a sufficient degree.
But moreover, if one has developed Photoshop for 15 years, I'm pretty sure they are aware of power user table-stakes features.
And then one more point:
> Why?
Because that's what it takes to develop high quality software tools. This shouldn't even be up for debate when charging money for software.