[mistersquid]

> > Also, those that claimed this article is ironically a casualty of it’s own complaint are 100% right, Kudos.

> Why would the article be a casualty of its own complaint?

The "Disclaimer" section was added after the initial publication according to the Wayback Machine.[0]

[0] https://web.archive.org/web/20260506162056/https://nooneshap...