[blks]

The main point here is _using_ copyrighted materials to create a commercial product, that you then sell, that may be used as alternative or substitute for the original materials. You’re missing that point and talking about two independent projects competing.

[AnthonyMouse]

Because the competition is the only source of alleged harm, but people can do that even if they don't copy anything. There isn't actually a property right to the customers. You can lose sales to someone else whether they copied anything or not.

[blks]

So what that you can loose sales even without crimes being committed? This somehow makes it okay to profit off someone’s work and ignore licenses?