Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by AuthAuth 48 days ago
Sent from my iPhone is worse than intel inside or claude in the commits in my opinion.

There is something so gross about injecting an advertising message into every single communication a user has on their device.

5 comments

I recall there was some understanding that it had a legitimate use as well as the obvious marketing, which was to advise the reader that the message may be unexpectedly concise or contain errors because it was sent from a cell phone, something less common before the iPhone came out. BlackBerry phones did this too for the same reasons.
“Sent from my mobile phone” - no need to inject a product name
You misunderstand the purpose of "Sent from my iPhone" - it was a status symbol, it showed that the sender was part of the superior iPhone owning elite. It was trivial to remove, but most didnt "oh, I am too busy too remove it, I guess I'll just leave it and let everybody know I can afford an iPhone".

You are right, it was advertising, but it advertized the user, not Apple.

That's advertising with extra steps. Apple having created an ingroup and an outgroup is very effective advertising on their side.
I always thought this was an implicit request to forgive obvious typos and autocorrect mistakes. Sent from a mobile device (iPhone, Samsung Galaxy, Blackberry, Windows Phone, etc.) with a tiny keyboard and in a setting in which proofreading may not be as rigorous as normal.
At least “Sent from my iPhone” was a factual claim, unlike this mess.
“Sent from my iPhone” is a default signature, but you can change the message under Settings -> Apps -> Mail -> Signature (at the bottom of the options page)
These are the same thing. Marketing, and the ability to track reach. There's no other reason to do this.