Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Imnimo 38 days ago
>But this is where the line slightly blurs in my head. Did we possibly just build the first human biocomputer and immediately put it in a simulated hell, playing the same game on loop, forever? Using the same reward mechanisms we use for LLMs?

This description does not seem to really match what was done in the Doom demo, and makes me skeptical that the author has actually looked into the details.
2 comments
jwilber 37 days ago
Author clearly doesn’t know the field well at all. First few paraphrases reveal this. Opening sentence: I’ve been in the AI space since ChatGPT first dropped.

Everyone is allowed to have an opinion, but that doesn’t mean they’re all worth listening to. Unfortunately, right now, all of those opinions are about ai.

link
sinfulprogeny 37 days ago
> since ChatGPT first dropped.

That'd be in November of 2022.

https://openai.com/index/chatgpt/

link
robot-wrangler 38 days ago
> skeptical that the author has actually looked into the details.

Nevermind the experiment.. same deal for a lot of people who are only interested enough to offer opinions about consciousness and theory-of-mind without doing any of the boring background reading.

The bottom line in TFA is maybe just about unapologetic carbon-chauvinism. But although OP has "been in the AI space since ChatGPT first dropped" and "bothered by this for months", they don't seem aware of terms or the usual problems with this position. Your average non-technical scifi reader has a more nuanced take than AI bros puffing up blogs for linked-in traffic

link