[anikom15]

It does. That isn’t going to survive judicial review.

[giantg2]

It very well could. See the restriction of fictional adult material depicting fictional minors just because there is a theory of those fake materials contributing to viewers becoming predators in the future. Same sort of harm to children logic could be used here.

[anikom15]

VPN instructions aren’t obscene.

[giantg2]

When they are on a porn site and intended to expose the porn, then the result is.

[dylan604]

That's a very bold statement. What gives you the confidence to make it?

[Freedom2]

Must be the confident free speech.