|
|
|
|
|
by chrisss395
38 days ago
|
|
Yes...but isn't his employment contract structured to incent this kind of move? His pay is 100% at-risk in the form of 170M+ stock options that only vest if he hits some astronomical targets. I'm just not sure his rationale is completely objective given such a structure... |
|
Which is why the board would have to approve the deal and he can’t act alone on it. He was hired to create and execute the strategy including finding the target. The real question is, why did he get hired to do something anyone could have done?