| I work on Bun, and this post is confusing to me. Me personally and the Bun team continues to dogfood & make Bun better everyday. Our development pace has only gotten faster. Bun's stability has improved significantly since joining Anthropic. Here are some things shipping in the next version of Bun: - 17 MB smaller Windows x64 binaries [0] - 8 MB smaller Linux binaries [1] - `--no-orphans` CLI flag to recursively kill any lingering processes spawned [3] - SSL context caching for client TCP & unix sockets, which significantly reduces memory usage for database clients like Mongoose/MongoDB [4] - Experimental HTTP/3 & HTTP/2 client in fetch [5] - Experimental HTTP/3 support in Bun.serve() [6] - Bun.Image, a builtin image processing library [7] (Along with several reliability improvements to node:fs, Worker, BroadcastChannel, and MessagePort) The Anthropic acquisition also means Bun no longer needs to become a revenue-generating business. We are very incentivized to make Bun better because Claude Code depends on it, and so many software engineers depend on Claude Code to help get their work done. [0]: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pull/30219 [1]: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pull/30098 [2]: https://github.com/oven-sh/WebKit/pull/211 [3]: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pull/29930 [4]: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pull/29932 [5]: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pull/29863 [6]: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pull/30032 |
Perhaps Bun will be the exception, but you can't say that the concern is unfounded.
The CEO of Anthropic has a habit of making outlandish predictions about how AI is so very close to replacing human programmers. Anthropic has been applying this belief to Claude Code and it has become a giant heap of unmaintainable spaghetti.