[chungusamongus]

You're having trouble staying on topic. Each pathetic attempt strays further and further from the central question here, which is the use of AI in films and the Academy's decision to impose certain rules around that. The issue is whether this is a meaningless gesture or if it will have real consequences in terms of determining this technology's implementation. What's more troubling is, you haven't demonstrated an understanding of Wittgenstein in the first place yet you confidently cite him to substantiate your circular argument. I'm not particularly concerned with what you think is relevant or not to the discussion as you are guilty of begging the question. Citing Wittgenstein doesn't help you here. If you think it does, you are stuck in the weeds of a language game. Your reply wasn't an adequate counterargument; it was a pretentious non sequitur.

[spankibalt]

Allow me to skip your drivel to the only point worth addressing:

> "The issue is whether [...] it will have real consequences in terms of determining this technology's implementation."

It certainly has consequences regarding this technology's implementation at the Academy.

[chungusamongus]

Certainly? Sounds like a baseless assertion.