[monooso]

In what way is this statue state sanctioned?

[like_any_other]

In addition to the other explanations (it's in the heart of London and not being removed), it's also advancing the government position of deconstructing national identity (for Britons): https://britainmagazine.co.uk/diversity-built-britain-50p/

[declan_roberts]

It's on display in downtown London dude. Also who do you think paid for it?

[monooso]

It was erected surreptitiously in the dead of night. That does not imply state approval.

As for who paid for it, I don't know, possibly the extremely successful and wealthy artist who created it.

If you have any evidence to the contrary, by all means present it.

[Shocka1]

Anecdote, a close family member of mine is a director of arts for a very large city in the US. They typically install/uninstall at night - she's told me this is especially important with cultural or otherwise edgy pieces.

[gib444]

It not being taken down yet implies state approval (4 days now?). It's on Pall Mall ffs, right near a statue of a King

It's not like the wealthiest city in the UK is lacking in resources to do something about it.

[tim333]

It's not government funded or planned. Although the establishment seems to like it unlike that one on the law courts.