[dragonwriter]

Idealism may be a “philosophically valid position”, whatever that means, but physicalism is the only framework which supports any means of resolving questions of what exists and what properties things that exist have; empirical science and the technology dependent on it works to the extent that physicalism is, if not necessarily correct, at least a useful framework for predicting future experiences. Idealism has no similar utility, however “philosophically valid” it might be.

[qsera]

>a useful framework for predicting future experiences

I think if MUH is true, we will find ourselves alone in this universe. Does that qualify?