Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by everyone 52 days ago
Fyi, most of them have not been cracked, but bypassed using a hypervisor that operates in ring-1, so it is certainly a security risk..

Personally I've been voting with my wallet and *never* supporting DRM, so there have been some games where I'm just "Well, I guess I'll never play that game." At least I have an ethical option to play certain games now, I'm just gonna use a seperate blank pc cus these bypasses are novel.

2 comments

All software piracy is a security risk since they could embed malware in the game.
Running Windows is a massive risk cus its made by Microsoft and it has ring 0 access to your system. I personally trust a cracker in good standing far more that I would any corp.
Cracking refers to all methods of circumventing copy protection. Bypassing is just another way of cracking something.
Untrue, cracking software necessitates _removing_ the protection from the executable completely. Whereas with a bypass, Denuvo is still running on your computer, albeit ineffectually.

This has implications - the bypasses cannot run on Linux for example where a cracked executable could. They are not the same thing.

Ehhh, afaik thats not the case in the community. These hypervisor bypasses are considered a different category. Like look at any scene page, they will 100% say Hypervisor or HV for these.
Last scene release with Denuvo crack was like 6 years ago.
Not true, in this year alone there have already been around 10 denuvo cracks (not hypervisor bypasses) and more will come.
None were from scene
That doesn't exclude them from being cracks. They still follow scene rules.
They are referred to as Hypervisor cracks.
They are (correctly and most commonly) called hypervisor bypasses because they do not remove the DRM from the executable.
Yeah I guess I was being pedantic. It doesnt matter. The important thing is that Deunvo is getting royally fucked.