[frollogaston]

It prevents anyone from blatantly using AI. If they want to use it anyway and risk getting found out, sure. That's still a big difference.

[0x3f]

Can you explain how an Oscar-worthy piece of writing would somehow be able to contain blatant AI-generated content? How would it have already passed the good-enough-for-an-Oscar filter?

[frollogaston]

If there's some admission or evidence internally that they used AI.

[0x3f]

But in order for that to be required, it couldn't be 'blatant'. Unless you mean the admission itself is 'blatant'? Then, I suppose so, although the normal interpretation of that would be from the content itself.