[eduction]

Devil’s advocate: they’re more demanding because, unlike employees, they are not pushovers. They have skin in the game.

You seem to have equated “more likely to terminate with critical comments” to “worst.” Seems pretty reductive.

[alwa]

For that matter—not seeing the source interactions or the prompts—I wonder the extent to which business owners see business relationships as negotiated rather than “picked from the shelf.”

When I’m dealing with small businesses, I tend to explain my frustrations long before I cancel, and offer them a chance to fix them. Whereas with an off-the-shelf product, there’s no point: I say “just cancel my subscription please and thank you.”

I could see that being coded as “confrontational,” but more often than not, I and the vendor fix what’s bothering us and continue with our mutually beneficial relationship.

Oftentimes, I’m not the only customer with that pain, and fixing it with me has the happy side effect of making their product or service more attractive to others too.

By the time I do leave for good, that process has failed, so it doesn’t surprise me that there will be residual reasons for leaving…

[ericd]

Yeah, you’re the best kind of customer. And I’ve found that fixing those issues tends to make those customers into evangelists.

[theandrewbailey]

They might be entitled people or sociopaths.

[lelanthran]

Unlikely. The majority of businesses are bootstrapped with a loan.

Those that survive are often the result of an owner who had their hand on the wheel through some very desperate times, times which would have killed the business had they stopped micromanaging.

[eduction]

Are those the only people who terminate business deals “with friction,” sociopaths?

Disagreements are normal and leaping to words like “worst” or “sociopath” because one occurs is not going to produce a sustainable business IMO.