|
|
|
|
|
by trangram
54 days ago
|
|
Thanks for trying this out. I'll fix the off-screen issue later. I created this game because of an old news my wife shared with me, it was about The New York Times bought the Wordle game. I was then surprised that such a simple, old-style game caught the attention of a big company. I said "I'd rather play a matchstick puzzle", and it was that moment that inspired me to create a free online version with all the puzzles procedurally generated by my own hand-made solver (I like the sound of this :D). Personally, I like moving one and only one matchstick to solve a puzzle rather than 2 or 3 sticks, also I don't like those tricky solutions like negative number, rotation trick and etc. although they could be a very creative solution and let you think outside the box sometimes, IMO, it is just not elegant and sometime distracting to encourage people to think in a systematic way. |
|
I remember one of my freshman computer science assignments was to make a Rubik’s Cube game. That was when a lot of undergrads were first introduced to the idea of using a stack and then "unwinding" it to simultaneously build the problem + solution.