[princevegeta89]

Well, I know Bitwarden is pretty demanding and also not so straightforward to do self-hosting.

But we have Vaultwarden which is ridiculously easy to deploy and also very lightweight while being immensely popular; has never had any major security incidents so far - and it has thousands of eyes on it for every single commit.

I've been hosting this for three years now and I have never had a single problem with it. always worked with my Bitwarden clients on all of my devices. So if you would like to, try Vaultwarden.

[muppetman]

You could have just posted "I didn't read the article" instead of this comment. It specifically addresses vaultwarden quite a number of times.

[prism56]

Not the original commenter. Just thought I would comment here. I'd be super interested in reading more information in why Bitwarden Lite is inadequate vs vaultwarden.