[al_james]

This is very interesting! I agree about the operational complexity of many systems, cough Kubernetes.

For most systems, state storage is the toughest problem, have you considered adding some form of storage layer over the top or would you recommend another solution that allows all the workloads to share state?

[debarshri]

I agree with operational complexity of kubernetes. That is the reason why we started writing single binary rust based kubernetes compliant platform [1]. Think of it like a minimal kubernetes rewritten in rust. Basically, you can deploy with kubectl.

I like wasm idea here. I'm probably going to add wasm as runtime for this project.

[1] https://github.com/debarshibasak/superkube

[sambigeara]

This is a cool idea!

[imcritic]

That's an interesting project, don't give up!

P.s.: it's a shame that a rust lib for containers has a hardcoded path to sock file. That's weird.

[sambigeara]

Oo good question. I'd prefer to keep external storage solutions as an exercise for the reader. I've touched on this in other comments, but I am looking to introduce state to the cluster internally, but for more sophisticated storage solutions, I'll probably avoid steering the project towards any one solution, at least for now.