[d1sxeyes]

> if you can’t respect a boundary of not revealing source without projecting an imagined bad onto that, that’s just you, my dude, and I’m not responsible how you react at all

I’m responding to the change, as something worth scrutiny. You used to publish open source projects, now this is closed source. Why?

> So you might wanna try to put your mistaken attitude on me, but really you need to own that. And your attitude seems mistakenly entitled

What mistaken attitude, what am I putting on you, and what is my “entitlement”?

> You judged too quickly > You shouldn’t be arguing > my advice is

Please stop dressing up your arguments as some kind of metaphysical commentary on my character. I don’t need advice, I didn’t judge you, and I didn’t plan on arguing. You built something, some people think it’s cool, a lot of people think it’s problematic. You want to keep it closed source, some people find that worrying.

Keep your faux pity for yourself, engage with me in good faith on the merits of the points I’m making, otherwise we’re done here.

[keepamovin]

You think I owe you source code, is entitled. You project strange onto change, is low empathy. There's no metaphysics, your unwarranted criticism is a reflection of your character. Don't pretend your weird subjective reaction is anything I need to respond to, nor any reflection of me - it's just you.

You have 0 right to attack or accuse me in any way. That you think you do makes you even more entitled and low empahty. Geez....