|
|
|
|
|
by protocolture
50 days ago
|
|
I agree but I dont see a better way to achieve it. Look at it this way. If a human has interpreted their LLM use so well that they can submit to zig and not get caught, then the LLM use is acceptable. What they are doing in practice is filtering off all the submissions from lazy people who dont sit between the LLM and the PR. If you cant be bothered to cover your tracks enough to make the LLM output into a good PR, thats no longer the maintainers problem. In a decade all of these anti AI policies will go away as the costs go up, and LLMs become less detectable. In the mean time it seems very efficient. |
|