|
|
|
|
|
by solid_fuel
54 days ago
|
|
> The same argument applies to open source itself. Why use someone's project when you can just have the robot write your own? This is only a valid strategy if you either a) understand the problem domain well enough to make a judgement call on what the LLM shits out. or b) don't care about the correctness of the project. Obviously, many software devs feel comfortable enough with CS problems to validate the LLM solution, but a flower shop owner does NOT know enough about accounting to vibe code a bookkeeping project, so for a shop owner an open source option - with many human contributors and actual production use elsewhere - would be a much better choice. |
|