|
|
|
|
|
by xtracto
49 days ago
|
|
In my view duration is not the problem, but copyright itself is. Nobody should expect to be "passively" paid for a job/effort made at a past point in time. You work 40 hours this week, you get paid 40 hours at whatever your rate. Authors should use other ways to charge for their 40/80 hours work, and when released it should be in the public domain. Scientists have learned to do it (by getting tenured or postdocs), im sure other can do it. |
|
I'm not expecting to be "passively paid" for my hobbies. But I'm expecting that someone won't steal and profit from the things I make. Why would that be fair?