[watwut]

> he thing I value most in software now isn't robust tests or thorough documentation - an LLM can spit those out in a few minutes.

Can it if we stop defining "robust tests" as "a lot of test code lines" and "good documentation" as "lengthy documentation"?

[simonw]

I chose my words carefully. "Robust tests" are tests that provide high coverage and aren't flaky. "Thorough documentation" likewise is documentation that describes as much of the code as possible.

I didn't use the word good.