[wallst07]

Fanbase, maybe. Software engineers using these projects? Probably forking and updating themselves.

FWIW, I've opened a half dozen PRs from LLMs and had them approved. I have some prompts I use to make them very difficult to tell they are AI.

However if it is a big anti-llm project I just fork and have agents rebase my changes.

[jcgrillo]

Your employer allows/encourages this? Do you run that stuff in production? Would you mind telling us where you work so we can avoid using their products? It is just not possible to trust the software that emerges from the process you've described.

[ejpir]

so, they are approved, which means they were most likely reviewed. yet you still think the software cannot be trusted of that and even want to name and shame a company. utterly stupid.

[jcgrillo]

Yes. If a company is running vibeslopped compilers to build their production artifacts I absolutely want to know which one it is, so I can protect myself from their software.

> utterly stupid

That's completely uncalled for.

EDIT: What exactly do you mean by:

> most likely reviewed.

Let's say every line was actually reviewed. That's still nowhere near good enough. The changes are being reviewed by the wrong people. Not the maintainers of the project, just some random folks who have inherited a vibecoded fork.