Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by monegator 45 days ago
And who should pay that tax? me? the average joe?

they are not providing me a vehichle that is as good and as convenient as my 12yo diesel station wagon. if 8 years ago - when i bought it - it cost 90% of my then income, the same model/trim now costs 110% of my current yearly income. Consider that in the meantime i've doubled my income.

For the same reason, the equivalent EV is completely out of the question, but i'd rather get an hybrid.

Even at current diesel prices i see no reason to get in debt to change a perfectly good car that has at least 100k to 150k km left to give.

Make simillar reasoning for switching heating from natural gas to heat pumps. Most houses in my area are not insulated for it, nor the climate is well suited, material and electricity cost too much to recoup the investment without heavy subsidies (and you pay for them indirectly anyway)

And in the end, judging by our energy mix, electricity would be generated by petrol and natural gas so what's the point. A bit more efficiency for my extreme inconvenience?

I'd rather have them build some nuke reactors, that will really make a difference.