|
|
|
|
|
by bambax
57 days ago
|
|
It's a shift but it's a little worse. Checking/auditing search results is easier and more ingrained; even if many people don't do it, everyone has been hit by spam at some point, everyone knows it exists. LLMs are the same thing but have an air of authority about them that a web search lacks, at least for now. |
|
Recently one of them asked Gemini a very detailed question about some specific baseball stats and was exclaiming over the quality of the information he got back and how it would have been impossible or at least extremely difficult to find the information via a traditional search.
It wasn't until his cohost asked if he had verified the information that be realized no, he hadn't, he had just immediately taken it at face value.
I recognize this is a single anecdote, but I think it illustrates that there is a tendency to trust what an LLM gives you, when it's stated so factually and with so much detail -- even if you should know better.